[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom

To: Morbus Iff <morbus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
From: Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:49:47 -0400
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Morbus Iff wrote:

I would like to propose, nay, admonish, that the name of the format and spec
should be Atom....

+1

-joe

--
http://BitWorking.org
http://WellFormedWeb.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
  - From: Dean Allen

References:
- 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
  - From: Morbus Iff

Prev by Date: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by Date: RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Previous by thread: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by thread: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread