Re: AtomAPI Rev 08

[Steve Jenson <sjenson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Speaking for Blogger, we've been following the recommendation given at:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/DifferentlyAbledClients

Which asks that servers support both REST and SOAP Document Literal 
and let clients use either.

-steve


On Tue Dec 02 12:37:50 PST 2003, James Robertson
<jarober@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Here's my question - the spec looks ok, but how would I support it from a
> client tool perspective?  There's no specified protocol for sending Atom
> messages; rather, it seems wide open.  If it's wide open, with some people
> supporting a REST based scheme, and others (like Google) supporting SOAP,
> how would I go about creating a client that works?
> 
> At 01:55 PM 12/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Rev 08 of the AtomAPI has been released:
> >
> >   http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/
> >
> >Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >         -joe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> <Talk Small and Carry a Big Class Library>
> James Robertson, Product Manager, Cincom Smalltalk
> http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/blog/blogView
> jarober@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>