--- Steve Jenson <sjenson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Speaking for Blogger, we've been following the recommendation given at:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/DifferentlyAbledClients
Which asks that servers support both REST and SOAP
Document Literal and let clients use either.
I'd rather see a spec for a SOAP version of the API. I
have issues with the current API but have been holding
off on commenting until there was actually a SOAP
version specified since this is what I am interested
in implementing.
For instance, I'd rather use WS-Security than some
custom HTTP headers which have been hinted at as what
the RESTful ATOM APi will support.
If no one plans to write this then I'm ready to
volunteer to start working on a document describing
the SOAP version of the ATOM API which will move in
lock step with the RESTful ATOM API.