Re: Proposed issue : link rev attribute

[Graham <dtcd@xxxxxxx>]

I'm like the idea rev, it makes it that little bit more machine 
readable, as long as it's consistent across pairs - is rel is always 
child or forward, rev is always parent or back. Actually I'm a bit 
concerned about it being confusing, as exactly what we're doing isn't 
obvious at first glance, and the rel attribute itself is brand new. But 
maybe that won't such an issue.

I'd say we flip a coin on this one, unless anyone has strong feelings 
either way?

Graham