[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Feedback on 0.3 Format

To: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Feedback on 0.3 Format
From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:51:31 +0200
Cc: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Dec 19, 2003, at 19:23, Sam Ruby wrote:

Again, the goal as I see it is to unabiguously annotate these four cases.


Instead of allowing anything with an annotation, I'd just not allow for
<content type="text/plain" mode="???">I &amp;lt;3 NY</content>
with any value of mode if the desired rendering is "I <3 NY".

--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@xxxxxx
http://iki.fi/hsivonen/

References:
- Re: Feedback on 0.3 Format
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Feedback on 0.3 Format
  - From: Sam Ruby

Prev by Date: Re: Extensions again (was RE: Subjects was: Please forgive some newbie questions...)
Next by Date: RE: Feedback on 0.3 Format
Previous by thread: RE: mode= and type= not orthogonal
Next by thread: Re: Feedback on 0.3 Format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread