[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)

To: Mark Pilgrim <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
From: David Jacobs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:53:43 -0500
Cc: "'atom-syntax'" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Dec 29, 2003, at 2:06 PM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:

We are not interested in revisiting this issue over and over again with every latecomer who gate-crashes this community in a feeble attempt to push their particular technological fetish.

+1


David Jacobs
Director of Technology, MediaRights.org
(646) 230 6288
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- The type attribute and HTTP content negotiation.
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
  - From: Danny Ayers

References:
- RE: Re[2]: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2
  - From: Bob Wyman
- Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
  - From: Mark Pilgrim

Prev by Date: (Atom) Sandler 0.4 available
Next by Date: RE: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
Previous by thread: Re: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
Next by thread: RE: Technological fetishism (was Re: mnot-03, Infoset & syntax in sect. 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread