RE: What do we get with PUT/DELETE?

["Danny Ayers" <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >  Keep the Atom REST API as is and simply drop the requirement of
> > PUT/DELETE, either by making the endpoints different (one for each
> > type of action), or adding an "action" tag under the entry.
> >
> >  Seems a reasonable compromise to me.
>
> +1 -Tim

+1

Though I'd prefer it done in a way that didn't throw away PUT/DELETE.

i.e. PUT/DELETE should still be the first choice, with the POST-based
approach as an alternative, where it's impossible or inconvenient to use the
other verbs.

PUT/DELETE wouldn't be a requirement, just a recommendation.

Cheers,
Danny.