[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable

To: Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable
From: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:16:42 -0800
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I just posted http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/XmlBaseEverywhere (linked from http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/FormatSpecDraft). I hope it's not controversial. If it is, discussion here please. -Tim

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable
  - From: Dave Pawson
- Re: Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable
  - From: Sam Ruby

Prev by Date: Re: What do we get with PUT/DELETE?
Next by Date: RE: <id> and <link> are broken! (was RE: base and atom:id)
Previous by thread: Re: <id> and <link> are broken! (was RE: base and atom:id)
Next by thread: Re: Added proposal to make xml:base generally applicable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread