[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)

To: Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:40:49 -0500
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Joe Gregorio wrote:


In response to the discussion over
clients that can't support PUT/DELETE
I have put up a Pace that proposes
changes to the AtomAPI to accomodate
such clients.

http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PacePutDelete

My preference would be to retain the ability of people who chose to employ SOAP toolkits to do a POST to a weblog.

- Sam Ruby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
  - From: Bill de hÓra

References:
- Re: What do we get with PUT/DELETE?
  - From: Sam Ruby
- RE: What do we get with PUT/DELETE?
  - From: Randy Charles Morin
- RE: What do we get with PUT/DELETE?
  - From: James Robertson
- PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: Letter from Planet Web on identifiers
Next by Date: Re: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
Previous by thread: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
Next by thread: Re: PacePutDelete (was What do we get with PUT/DELETE?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread