RDF redux

[Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I see some discussion going on in

  http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/RSSVote

I think such exploration is healthy, but personally would prefer that a 
proposal more fully flushed out on the mailing list first.

This "RSSVote" suggests "abandons the current Atom syntax" yet "Some 
Atom syntax elements not already present in RSS 1.0 would be added to 
RSS 1.0 as a module extension.".  Which ones?

I'll offer the following as a guide for an initial checklist of things 
to explore: http://www.intertwingly.net/slides/2003/xmlconf/ .  That 
doesn't mean that any proposals need to come up with the same solutions, 
or even accept all the same requirements, but it does provide a basis 
for comparision.

- Sam Ruby