[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: W3C Invitation

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: W3C Invitation
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 16:18:08 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On May 14, 2004, at 8:44 AM, Michael Champion wrote:

- Does it seem a bit odd that W3C made this initiative by asking the IESG not to approve the Atom work because they wanted it, rather than approaching you folks to see if you wouldn't rather standardize Atom under the W3C umbrella? Or were there some back-channel activities?

Yes, several W3C people have mentioned to Sam and me and I think other people that they'd like us to look at the W3C, going back quite some time now. We asked them to put up their hand and raise the issue with the community. Which Eric has now done (thanks Eric). -Tim

References:
- W3C Invitation
  - From: Michael Champion

Prev by Date: Re: W3C Invitation
Next by Date: Re: W3C Invitation
Previous by thread: W3C Invitation
Next by thread: RE: W3C Invitation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread