[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group

Subject: Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:06:27 -0400
Cc: Eric Miller <em@xxxxxx>, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>, iesg@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

I have placed my comments on this response at:

http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/05/23/First-Choice

In summary: I would prefer if this W3C response does not further impeed progress towards establishing an IETF working group.

- Sam Ruby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
  - From: Danny Ayers

References:
- Fwd: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
  - From: Eric Miller
- Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
  - From: Mark Nottingham

Prev by Date: Re: W3C invitation, Atom and RDF
Next by Date: RE: W3C invitation, Atom and RDF
Previous by thread: Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
Next by thread: Re: W3C response to proposed Atom Publishing Format and Protocol (atompub) working group
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread