Re: PaceSimpleContentType

[Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Graham wrote:

> On 3 Jun 2004, at 3:54 pm, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> > Question: can you give a single example of a valid <content> element 
> > which specifies a type="inline-xhtml" that would not still be valid 
> > and express the same value if the type were changed to "plain-text"?
>
> Anything with tags in?
>
> "A type attribute with the value "plain-text" indicates that the 
> element's content consists of **only parsed XML character data**."

Arg.  I stated it backwards.  Let me try again:

Question: can you give a single example of a valid <content> element
which specifies a type="plain-text" that would not still be valid
and express the same value if the type were changed to "inline-xhtml"?

-Sam Ruby