[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceSimpleContentType

On 3 Jun 2004, at 4:43 pm, Sam Ruby wrote:

Arg. I stated it backwards. Let me try again:

Question: can you give a single example of a valid <content> element
which specifies a type="plain-text" that would not still be valid
and express the same value if the type were changed to "inline-xhtml"?

Alright, anything with carriage returns or other significant whitespace. The spec doesn't explain whether whitespace should be preserved in plain-text mode (it needs to) - but I'd assume it would be.

Graham

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature