[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)

To: Ken MacLeod <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:39:00 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Just to be clear: are you against using any MIME content-typing in XML, or using MIME multi-parts in XML? I could certainly agree with the latter, but the former seems a useful way to say "this blob has the following format" in a way that stays with the blob.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)
  - From: Ken MacLeod

References:
- Re: PaceSimpleContentType
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: PaceSimpleContentType
  - From: Eric Scheid
- Re: PaceSimpleContentType
  - From: Greg Stein
- -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)
  - From: Ken MacLeod

Prev by Date: Re: Atom-format belongs in W3C. Atom-API belongs in IETF...
Next by Date: Re: Draft proposal: Indirection for <content>
Previous by thread: -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)
Next by thread: Re: -1 on MIME-in-XML (was Re: PaceSimpleContentType)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread