[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Not invented here.

To: "Atom Syntax'" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Not invented here.
From: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 07:35:22 -0700
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Linked from http://bitworking.org/news/Not_Invented_Here are two versions of an Atom feed, one using an all-Atom vocabulary, one using as many elements as possible borrowed or imported from other vocabularies. I just spent a couple of minutes looking at them and so far haven't made up my mind what I think. Good work, Joe. -Tim

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Not invented here. (Inheritance vs. Composition)
  - From: Bob Wyman
- Re: Not invented here.
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: PaceSimpleContentType
Next by Date: Re: PaceSimpleContentType
Previous by thread: RE: POST vs (eg.) NEWRESOURCE (was: HTTP, WebDAV, and POST)
Next by thread: Re: Not invented here.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread