Re: Semantics

[Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ahh! Damn that redirect button.

Sorry for the mistake.

On 8 Jun 2004, at 21:25, Henry Story wrote:

> I posted the following on the atom-syntax list, but have not got any 
> feedback there. I'll post it here for the record.

Come to think of it I did not ask any questions. So it is not 
surprising that there are no answers either. I spent too much time 
drawing the diagrams to think of asking the questions:

	- which of the two models seems more representative of what people 
have in mind on this list?
    - If there are things that need clarification don't hesitate to ask 
me, I have spent some time working on this, and may have convinced 
myself of some of the things I have done but not explained the reasons 
for those decisions clearly in the short e-mail.
	- If I am posting to the wrong list, please let me know.
	- Is there anything else I would need to do to make the post more 
relevant to
	this list?
	- Has this perhaps been discussed to death before already?
	

The purpose of what I am doing is to create a model of what an Atom 
feed is, so that I can create a database of all the feeds I write and 
subscribe to. I am using OWL to help me explore this area and am 
implementing the ideas in a small prototype of BlogEd. I think this 
process leads one to ask some interesting questions.

 Please note that I am not doing this to impose RDF on the community: 
specs such as GRDDL and others make that unnecessary. In fact the next 
thing I am going to do is write an GRDDL converter from Atom to one of 
my models. I was hoping the feedback from the list would help me easily 
eliminate one of the models.

Sorry again about the repost.

Henry