[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF action

To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IETF action
From: Anne van Kesteren <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:05:16 +0200
Cc: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040526

My 2 cents: Although I do not have a preference, I would like to move on.
The IETF is fine with me.
I think W3C is the best choice, and that it's worth waiting for. Let's move on, but let's not rush it either.

+1


--
 Anne van Kesteren
 <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

References:
- IETF action
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Danny Ayers
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

Prev by Date: Re: IETF action
Next by Date: Re: PaceSimpleContentType
Previous by thread: Re: IETF action
Next by thread: Re: IETF action
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread