[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF action

To: "Asbjørn_Ulsberg" <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IETF action
From: Randy Charles Morin <randymorin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: randy@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I suggest we leave the IETF/W3C issue in the hands of Sam and Tim and move on. Let them make the best decision. Most of the peanut gallery don't know IETF and W3C from sh?t. That's not a shot at anybody, just MHO as a member of the peanut gallery.

Thanks and ride into the sunset like Reagan,

Randy

http://www.kbcafe.com

Asbjørn_Ulsberg <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:48:39 +0000, Robert Sayre
wrote:

> My 2 cents: Although I do not have a preference, I would like to move on.
> The IETF is fine with me.

I think W3C is the best choice, and that it's worth waiting for. Let's
move on, but let's not rush it either.

--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjornu@xxxxxxxxxxx
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»

Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Anne van Kesteren

References:
- Re: IETF action
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

Prev by Date: RE: no xml:lang = Weak I18N for entry
Next by Date: Re: no xml:lang = Weak I18N for entry
Previous by thread: Re: IETF action
Next by thread: Re: IETF action
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread