[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last look at W3C

To: Jason Shellen <shellen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last look at W3C
From: Danny Ayers <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:14:33 +0200
Cc: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Jason Shellen wrote:

can we extend the final IETF over W3C consensus poll until this Thursday, one week from Tim's original email?

That sounds sensible.

A week's not going to make a great deal of difference overall, and this is a point on which consensus should be clear. I would suggest that everyone makes clear their *first choice* rather than treating it as a done deal already. Speaking for myself, I'll happily go along with whatever is the majority at the end of that week. My first choice remains the W3C.

Cheers,
Danny.

--

Raw
http://dannyayers.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last look at W3C
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

References:
- Last look at W3C
  - From: Jason Shellen

Prev by Date: Re: no xml:lang = Weak I18N for entry
Next by Date: Re: Last look at W3C
Previous by thread: Last look at W3C
Next by thread: Re: Last look at W3C
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread