[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: well-formedness error

To: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: well-formedness error
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:32:15 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Couldn't we just use the same strong wording from the XML spec? Why should we differ from it?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

References:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Antone Roundy

Prev by Date: Re: PaceSimpleContentType
Next by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Next by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread