[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: well-formedness error

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: well-formedness error
From: Danny Ayers <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:28:13 +0200
Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

Personally I think there is NO EXCUSE for not having well-formed XML that is delivered with the correct MIME type to HTTP clients.

So you won't excuse it by implementing liberal interpretation policies?

Cheers,
Danny.

--

Raw
http://dannyayers.com

References:
- RE: well-formedness error
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: NEWRESOURCE
Next by Date: RE: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: RE: well-formedness error
Next by thread: RE: well-formedness error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread