RE: well-formedness error

To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: well-formedness error
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:29:22 -0700
Cc: <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D102C92985@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsof t.com>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D102C92985@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsof t.com>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 1:53 PM -0700 6/16/04, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

 3 would be rejected flat out since their MIME type claimed they weren't
XML

OK, that's bad. Out of curiosity, what did those three claim to be?

 4 would be rejected because their MIME contained incorrect or missing
charset information

That seems irrelevant as long as the XML received had the encoding in the ?xml entry correct for the object itself.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium