[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: well-formedness error

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: well-formedness error
From: Danny Ayers <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:00:43 +0200
Cc: James Robertson <jarober@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

-----Original Message----- From: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 3:43 PM To: James Robertson Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: well-formedness error

As an aggregator user I would prefer to use a tool with useful features rather than one that sacrificed them for cleaning up bad feeds.

Since when were these mutually exclusive? Quite frankly, it would be more work for me to parse charset headers in HTTP then reject 7 out of 10 Atom feeds than for me to continue with the status quo in RSS Bandit.

Aren't you using libraries? Don't they recognise ill-formedness?

Cheers,
Danny.

--

Raw
http://dannyayers.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Sam Ruby

References:
- RE: well-formedness error
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Re: Atom draft editors
Next by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: RE: well-formedness error
Next by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread