[Fwd: Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related"]

[Isofarro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> "related" is totally clear. The problem with link logs as seen on 
> multiple sites which have implemented this (Atom) model, such as Mark's 
> and mine is that we have 1 'main related' link and the other links are 
> just related to the post/that link.
>
> Also, the main link's title is the same as the post title from what I 
> have seen.

Right. Its now I understand what you're meaning. Just to clarify - if
the @title is not present, or identical to the title element of the
entry, that is the resource being discussed / pointed to?

Thanks,
Mike.