[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Namespace and media types

To: Ryan Tomayko <rtomayko@xxxxxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Namespace and media types
From: Graham <dtcd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:41:18 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 18 Jun 2004, at 3:21 pm, Ryan Tomayko wrote:

1. GET requests for Feeds (and Entries should they get URIs some day
[+1 btw]) SHOULD/MUST contain:

Accept: application/atom+xml

Is this in the slightest bit enforceable? Can Atom rules apply even before the program knows it's dealing with Atom?

Graham

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: James Aylett
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: Ryan Tomayko
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: James Robertson

References:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Mark Baker
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Antone Roundy
- Namespace and media types
  - From: Mark Baker
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Namespace and media types
  - From: Ryan Tomayko

Prev by Date: Re: Applicability of RFC 3470 for Atom
Next by Date: Re: Namespace and media types
Previous by thread: Re: Namespace and media types
Next by thread: Re: Namespace and media types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread