Re: Namespace and media types

[Ryan Tomayko <rtomayko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:23:02 +0100, James Aylett <james@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> or similar. However I think that Atom should favour the use of Accept
> where possible; in many cases, user agents will either only accept
> Atom, or accept a relatively few RSS-based alternatives, which is
> readily expressible in an Accept header (even with a complete fallback
> at the end with low-q in case people don't have their RSS feeds set up
> with an appropriate MIME type).

What James Aylett said :) Sorry if my attempts at communicating this
were confusing. I'm proposing that verbiage specific to the accept
header and conneg in general be added to AtomAPI spec under various
places in Section 5.

Ryan