Re: well-formedness error

["MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:16:40 +0200
Danny Ayers <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I'm reading things correctly, the dependency on responding correctly 
> to the header is in RFC 2023, which is under revision. Perhaps there may 
> be an approach available by which the specification of a particular 
> application can override the default rules, and insist on looking at the 
> doc post-delivery. In other words, is there/could there be a loophole?

I do not understand what you mean by "override the default rules".  But 
it is required that implementations of RFC 3023 work correctly for Atom-specific 
media types (if any).

Are you proposing to allow UTF-8 only for atom and disallow the charset 
parameter for application/atom+xml (or some such specialised media type)?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>