[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related" clarified

To: Ken MacLeod <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related" clarified
From: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:08:59 -0400
Cc: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 19 Jun 2004 11:01:48 -0500, Ken MacLeod <ken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> rel="inReplyTo" - This entry responds to or followups to the linked
>                   resource.
> 
> This would be the relation either between a comment and its main
> (parent) entry, between a comment and another comment (threading), or
> an entry and an entry elsewhere.

http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceLinkParent

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark

References:
- Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related" clarified
  - From: Eric Scheid
- Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related" clarified
  - From: Ken MacLeod

Prev by Date: Re: ERROR verb
Next by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: Re: [LinkLog] flaw in the link rel="related" clarified
Next by thread: HTTP, WebDAV, and POST
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread