[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ERROR verb

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ERROR verb
From: Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:15:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I sent in a proposal to TAG concerning this.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jun/0017.html

If I get burned so be it. If it gets reasonable acceptance I'll mention all your contributions. I hope I did not jump the gun. Sorry I got really enthusastic about this.

Henry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

References:
- RE: well-formedness error
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: James Robertson
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Danny Ayers
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: James Robertson
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Danny Ayers
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Henry Story
- ERROR verb (was: Re: well-formedness error)
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: ERROR verb (was: Re: well-formedness error)
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Bill de hÓra
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Bill de hÓra
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Bill de hÓra
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Bill de hÓra
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Ryan Tomayko
- Re: ERROR verb
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: ERROR verb
Next by Date: Standards matter even to liberals -- was Re: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: Re: ERROR verb
Next by thread: Re: ERROR verb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread