[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: well-formedness error

To: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: well-formedness error
From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:15:21 +0200
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Win32, build 3798)

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:39:37 +0900, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Could you please explain why this is unacceptable for text/xml but
perfectly fine for text/html, text/css, etc.?
It is also unacceptable for text/html, text/css, etc. If you read IETF RFCs for them, the default is US-ASCII. It is true that W3C specifications say differently.

Why doesn't the W3C specifications say differently about 'text/xml' as well?

--
Asbjørn Ulsberg         -=|=-        asbjornu@xxxxxxxxxxx
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»

Follow-Ups:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Martin Duerst
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

References:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Prev by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Next by Date: Re: ERROR verb
Previous by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Next by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread