[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: well-formedness error

To: Asbj$BS(Bn Ulsberg <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: well-formedness error
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:07:20 +0900
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


(BAt 13:15 04/06/20 +0200, Asbj$BS(Bn Ulsberg wrote:
(B
(B>On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:39:37 +0900, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
(B><EB2M-MRT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(B>
(B>>>Could you please explain why this is unacceptable for text/xml but
(B>>>perfectly fine for text/html, text/css, etc.?
(B>>
(B>>It is also unacceptable for text/html, text/css, etc.  If you read IETF
(B>>RFCs for them, the default is US-ASCII.  It is true that W3C
(B>>specifications say differently.
(B>
(B>Why doesn't the W3C specifications say differently about 'text/xml' as
(B>well?
(B
(BSorry, but the IETF and the W3C try to coordinate wherever possible.
(BHaving different specs say different things about the same thing
(Bhelps nobody.
(B
(BRegards,    Martin.

References:
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: well-formedness error
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

Prev by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Next by Date: Re: straw poll: "parent" vs. "in-reply-to"
Previous by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Next by thread: Re: well-formedness error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread