[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AtomPubIssuesList

To: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AtomPubIssuesList
From: Robert Sayre <mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:36:03 -0400
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: mint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)

Sam Ruby wrote:

If you disagree with any of my assessments, please post a comment on atom-sytax.

"PaceErrVerb <http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceErrVerb> : Still under active discussion" "PaceServiceError <http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceServiceError>: Need to reconcile with PaceErrVerb <http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceErrVerb>"

PaceErrVerb contains no spec text, but does suggest an out-of-scope extension to HTTP.

I realize that PaceServiceError is not low-hanging fruit.

Robert Sayre

[1] http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/AtomPubIssuesList

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AtomPubIssuesList
  - From: Danny Ayers

References:
- AtomPubIssuesList
  - From: Sam Ruby

Prev by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Next by Date: Re: well-formedness error
Previous by thread: AtomPubIssuesList
Next by thread: Re: AtomPubIssuesList
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread