[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Well-formedness statistics

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Well-formedness statistics
From: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:52:42 -0400
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:41:22 -0700, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This doesn't seem very consistent to me. On the one hand taking the MIME type seriously enough that encoding mismatches are called well-formedness errors but on the other ignoring it and resorting to content sniffing if the MIME type isn't an XML MIME type.

It would be more helpful if you could provide quotes from relevant
specifications.

> RE http://www.25hoursaday.com/rss10.xml <http://www.25hoursaday.com/rss10.xml>
> 
> That isn't my feed.

It is a feed, and it is on your domain.

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark

References:
- RE: Well-formedness statistics
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: RE: Well-formedness statistics
Next by Date: RE: Well-formedness statistics
Previous by thread: RE: Well-formedness statistics
Next by thread: RE: Well-formedness statistics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread