Re: Atompub WG Work Plan

To: Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Atompub WG Work Plan
From: Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 00:47:40 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

Tim Bray wrote:

- First draft revisions by July 2nd, clearly marked "do not implement"

Is there IETF precedent for this? If so, why?

cheers
Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atompub WG Work Plan
  - From: Dan Brickley
- Re: Atompub WG Work Plan
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC