Re: Well-formedness statistics

[Phil Ringnalda <philringnalda@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:26:52 -0400, Bob Wyman <bobwyman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> Mark Pilgrim wrote:
> > I analyzed 5096 RSS and Atom feeds chosen at random from Syndic8.com
>         Syndic8 is probably not a representative source for RSS and Atom
> feeds since they have a program of notifying and pestering the producers of
> non-well-formed feeds. Thus, the feeds they carry are probably
> uncharacteristically clean...

Good point: were those from just the 54,416 feeds that should in
theory be good, or also from the 10,385 marked "Awaiting Repair"?

Phil Ringnalda