Re: Well-formedness statistics

[Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Pilgrim wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:06:06 +0900, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
> <eb2m-mrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > [quotes from relevant specifications snipped]
>
>
> Thanks, that's very helpful.
>
>
> > So, I think that MIME entities labelled as text/plain are not well-formed
> > XML documents.
>
>
> OK, then my sample breaks down like this:
>
> 5096 total feeds
>
> 3241 (63.60%) are well-formed
> 917 (17.99%) are not well-formed due to non-XML media type (e.g. text/plain)
> 798 (15.66%) are not well-formed due to text/xml encoding mismatch
> (declared as text/xml but contains characters outside us-ascii)
> 25 (0.49%) are not well-formed due to other encoding mismatch
> (declared as some encoding but contains characters outside that
> encoding)
> 115 (2.26%) are not well-formed for other reasons (e.g. malformed markup)

Of the ones with malformed markup, what % of those
were from extra content at the end of the document?
Not that it matters for well-formedness, just curious.

	-joe

--
http://BitWorking.org
http://WellFormedWeb.org