Re: PaceUriOrItsSuccessor

[Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:49:54 -0700, Tim Bray <tim.bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> +1, but the rationale could be strengthened by pointing out that
> 2396bis has *many* improvements;

Perhaps someone more experienced could explain what they are, besides i18n.

>  and we only need to change the
> referent of [2396] in the References section, right?  No need for
> changes in multiple places in the text. -Tim

OK, if that's how these things work.

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark