[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceElementOrder: options

To: randy@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PaceElementOrder: options
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:48:06 -0700
Cc: Atomlist <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

How will extensions be ordered, in relation to the "core" metadata as well as themselves?

How do your tools benefit from ordering?

On Jul 12, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Randy Charles Morin wrote:

I like these question? Why disorder? What is the value of not specifying the order? I know that I have major pluses w/ my tools if we can just specify order. What's the counter argument?


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PaceElementOrder: options
  - From: Randy Charles Morin

References:
- Re: PaceElementOrder: options
  - From: Randy Charles Morin

Prev by Date: Re: Version vs. Namespace
Next by Date: Re: Normative WSDL for Atom API (was Re: Created proposal: PaceProvideSchema)
Previous by thread: Re: PaceElementOrder: options
Next by thread: Re: PaceElementOrder: options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread