[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative

To: Atomlist Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
From: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:11:54 -0700
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I don't think we have consensus on what we're replacing it with, but I think that we do have consensus that the description of multipart/alternative in 4.13.10 in draft-format-00 should go. This was my take-way from the Atom Community meeting back in June -Tim

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
  - From: Mark Pilgrim
- Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
  - From: Mark Nottingham

Prev by Date: Re: a methodical approach to defining what date elements we need
Next by Date: Editorial comments on draft-ietf-atompub-format-00
Previous by thread: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
Next by thread: Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread