Re: Editorial comments on draft-ietf-atompub-format-00

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 14/7/04 9:40 AM, "Asbjørn Ulsberg" <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> [Page 7, sect 3.2.2] "atom:url" has to go as an element name.  Either
>> "uri" or "web" would be a satisfactory replacement, but since there is
>> no in-effect normative text describing what "url" stands for, it's
>> really not appropriate.  Same for 4.9 and anywhere else "url" appears.
> 
> I had the feel that current consensus was to replace <url> with <link>, at
> least until we agree on what to do with <link>. Maybe when we agree on
> that, it gets reverted back to <url> again. ;-)


+1