[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative

To: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
From: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:54:05 -0400
Cc: Atomlist Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:11:54 -0700, Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think we have consensus on what we're replacing it with, but I
> think that we do have consensus that the description of
> multipart/alternative in 4.13.10 in draft-format-00 should go.  This
> was my take-way from the Atom Community meeting back in June -Tim

+1.  How about a single element called <choice>?

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
  - From: Tim Bray

References:
- Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: Editorial comments on draft-ietf-atompub-format-00
Next by Date: Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
Previous by thread: Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
Next by thread: Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread