Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative

[Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:54 PM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:

> > I don't think we have consensus on what we're replacing it with, but I
> > think that we do have consensus that the description of
> > multipart/alternative in 4.13.10 in draft-format-00 should go.  This
> > was my take-way from the Atom Community meeting back in June -Tim
>
> +1.  How about a single element called <choice>?

Actually, I thought we'd nuked the whole notion of 
multiple-alternative-representations-of-the-entry, so the idea would be 
to just lose multipart/alternative.  But it's possible I have the wrong 
recollection... -Tim

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature