Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces

To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:08:20 -0400
Cc: Atomlist Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Mark Nottingham wrote:

+1.

Do we want to replace this with something along the lines of "children of atom:feed and atom:entry must be namespace-qualified?"

Add atom:author and atom:contributor.

- Sam Ruby

References:
- Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
  - From: Mark Nottingham