Re: Editorial comments on draft-atompub-protocol-00

[Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:26:51 -0700, Tim Bray <tim.bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [page 3/sect 1.1] busted sentence: 'the and "OPTIONAL"'

Done.

> 
> [page 5/sect 3.1.3.3] the description of code 400 is borked, see the
> sentence "A short description of the error..."

Done.

> 
> Same for 3.1.3.4.

Done.

> 
> [page 5/sect 3.2] the description reads like it's forbidden to do a PUT
> without doing a GET first.  Is this true?  If I know the URI and I know
> what I want to put there, can't I just blast it in?

Good question. I will respond to this in a separate message.

> 
> [page 6/sect.3.2] there's nothing about return codes.  Perhaps you need
> a @to-do note?

Done. Return codes added.

> 
> [page 6/sect 3.3] Could the FeedURI and PostURI be the same URI?  I
> assume so, but it might be better to be explicit.

Done.