Re: Low-hanging fruit: multipart/alternative

[Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:02:37 -0700, Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, I thought we'd nuked the whole notion of
> multiple-alternative-representations-of-the-entry, so the idea would be
> to just lose multipart/alternative.  But it's possible I have the wrong
> recollection... -Tim

Well, I wasn't at that face-to-face meeting, and I don't recall us
discussing it on-list.  I wouldn't call it "low-hanging" to nuke it
permanently.

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark