/ Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say:
| Tim Bray wrote:
|
|> I went back and reviewed the examples, and I totally disagree. They
|> really are the same, and any chain of processing software that makes
|> them come out different is severely buggy, and I don't think
|> bugginess at that level is prevalent in widely-used XML-processing
|> tools.
|
| Ok, I won't dispute that re deployed processor behaviour. But I went
| back and reread the 1.1 Namespaces spec today and I didn't see where
| behaving the way you and Norm say they should not is considered a
| processing error. Seriously, did I miss it?
I'm not actually sure what you're asking. Given this document
<atom:feed xmlns:atom="http://example.org/atom";>
<atom:content mode="xml">
<no-ns>Non-namespaced element</no-ns>
</atom:content>
</atom:feed>
What transformation do you think should be valid that you believe
I think is not valid?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> | In great affairs men show themselves as
http://nwalsh.com/ | they wish to be seen, in small things
| they show themselves as they are.--
| Chamfort
Attachment:
pgp00132.pgp
Description: PGP signature