[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces

To: "'Atom Syntax'" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
From: "Scott Hollenbeck" <sah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:48:50 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

If I may, another "earlier IETF work" pointer that discusses XML namespaces:

ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3688.txt

This "best current practice" RFC talks about URIs used in IETF standards to
identify XML namespaces.

-Scott-

References:
- Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
  - From: Norman Walsh

Prev by Date: Re: Usage Scenarios for Versioning and Extensibility
Next by Date: Re: a methodical approach to defining what date elements we need
Previous by thread: Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
Next by thread: Re: Low-hanging fruit: compulsory namespaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread