[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point

To: Atom-Syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:21:41 -0700
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/16/29OPconnection_1.html? source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/16/ 29OPconnection_1.html

I'm not sure this is *really* a problem, in that we might decide that existing HTTP caching & traffic management techniques will suffice for Atom. But we should be conscious of it. -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Bandwidth consumtion and syndication feeds
  - From: Dare Obasanjo
- Re: A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point
  - From: Jonas Galvez
- Re: A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point
  - From: Mark Pilgrim

Prev by Date: Re: PaceReplaceLinkElement created
Next by Date: Re: PaceReplaceLinkElement: Is link-ness relevant?
Previous by thread: PaceReplaceLinkElement: Is link-ness relevant?
Next by thread: Re: A reminder we should think about congestion control at some point
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread