Yes. I'm debating with myself on whether I should consider this a bug or not.
From my point of view, in this case, it's clearly a bug.
What spec backs up this position? Reading the RSS 2.0 description of pubDate it seems to map quite well to dc:issued. I find it quote illogical to expect that the date of issuance for a particular entry should change, so RSS Bandit does not change the original pubDate of an entry.
I don't knonw whether I'm an edge case, but what I did certainly feels like a natural idiomatic use of the Web.
If it is idiomatic can you point at 5 other entities amongst the millions that use the WWW that also engage in this behavior?
NNW lets you choose whether to sort on date or title, I've never sorted by anything but date, which brings the revised version to the top. -Tim
The question isn't whether they sort on date but whether they replace old pubDate values with the new one or do other things to imply that the post has been updated.